It’s a Chick Thing (Or Not)

by Amber on April 1, 2010

I’ve had the honor of being mentioned in some lists this year that recognize women doing good things in social media (my industry) and business. I deeply appreciate being recognized for hard work, and for contributing something of value to my field.

So I hope it won’t come across as ungrateful when I mention that I don’t particularly identify with the alliances, groupings, or other things wherein my gender is the central pivot factor. It’s really just because, well, I’m a person first.

And there are probably lots of other monikers or classifications I’d put myself in before “woman” jumped to mind. Musician. Mom. Professional. Bibliophile and word nerd. Lover of science geekery. Equestrian. I’m passionate about being those things, and they are what I most identify with.

I’ve never felt particularly comfortable in things like women’s networking groups, or mom groups, or sororities, or anything that’s particularly female-only, or ever gotten really hypersensitive about feeling like I’m being looked at or treated differently because I’m female.

That’s not to say I don’t understand that gender disparities and discrimination aren’t real – they are the same way that racism or bias for sexual preference are, too. And I understand full well the gender-based atrocities that happen to women in other countries, and would unequivocally stand against such things.

But it’s just not where I choose to park my wagon, fortunate as I am to live and work in a culture that allows me to make choices that aren’t based on those biological facts. I’m a person that has so many dimensions, interests, and identifying characteristics that have far more to do with my intellect than my gender. And I never, ever want to fall back on my woman-ness as a reason for why something didn’t happen for me – for better or for worse. That just feels – well – like a copout.

Perhaps I’m lucky that I don’t feel like my gender has ever been in my way. Perhaps I’m too naive that I think my work, my contributions to society, my role as a parent and friend and professional can be determined by what I do and who I am beyond something as mundane as being a girl. Perhaps it’s shortsighted of me that I don’t get all riled about anything but the most blatant offenses of language – I figure most people railing against “chicks” or “broads” are really frustrated at much more than the fact that those people have a vagina.

So I’m going to continue to thank those that choose recognize me as a shining example of my gender, because perhaps it will show a young woman somewhere to realize she can be whatever she wants to be, if she’s feeling like being a girl or not is a defining factor.

But as it stands, what I’m really aiming for is to be recognized as an outstanding professional, parent, contributor, and person, regardless of my female persuasion. To inspire people, not just women. To challenge the way things are done, make waves, create impact, and give back something bigger than my own humanity.

The way I figure it, the indelible mark I make on this rock when I leave won’t care whether or not I was a chick.

image credit: Dominic’s pics

  • http://chelpixie.com Chel

    Amen.

    I, like you, haven’t ever felt as if gender was a problem for me. I feel very lucky for never having had a bad experience for being a woman. And the rest of your post nails exactly how I feel about being recognized as a person who does good things, not just as a woman.

    Cheers!

  • http://tr.im/renegade/ Robin2go

    Hooray for clarity of vision–not female vision, not chick vision, not woman vision, not even grrl vision, but for non-gender-specific vision. There are so many other things I want to be good at in this life, and you’ve nailed my feelings about it in this post. When I’ve made a name for myself, I want to be known for being good at what I do, not being good at what I do–for a girl.

  • http://www.foodphilosophy.com Jennifer Iannolo

    You aren’t allowed to write this many fabulous blog posts in one week. I, too, have never been a fan of “girls-only” clubs. I simply want to be around smart people, who are creating magnificent things, and their gender/orientation/hair color is totally irrelevant.

    Besides, boys are fun, too. :)

  • http://www.jeremymeyers.com/ Jeremy Meyers

    We’ve had this discussion offline, but I do think that pigeonholing people into any one group based on something that they dont really have any control over is a subtle form of discrimination.

    I, like many readers, have always been “the smart guy”. While obviously being smart is A Good Thing, I have also at times found it horribly isolating. Being known as ‘bright, gifted, smart’ definitely changes people’s expectations (hey, callback!) of what appropriate behavior coming from you is, and are more taken aback when you make a ‘dumb’ mistake.

    In the same way, I think a list of ‘smart women in social media’ can separate those people with a lot of value to contribute into a less useful conversation like “why arent there any women on this panel?!” While sexism and misogyny are still an issue around the world, I don’t think separating any one group out for recognition relative to other people in the group is as much of a unifying factor as people think it is, and i’m not sure its a net positive for feminism overall.

    I think a lot of us would put you in an ‘awesome person and great communicator regardless of whats between their legs’ list, if one were to exist.

  • http://www.obsessedwithconformity.com Jim Mitchem

    Well-said. I’ve made it my personal mission in life to be unbucketable.

  • http://www.jeremymeyers.com/ Jeremy Meyers

    ‘unbucketable’ is a bucket, Jim.

  • http://www.potluckmama.wordpress.com Beth Coetzee (Pot Luck Mama)

    This isn’t the first time you’ve expressed these sentiments. And, while I echo them on some levels, I have been fortunate enough to participate in a women’s group I find interesting, encouraging and refreshing in a male-dominated industry. In fact, I wrote about it a while back and thought of sending it to you but decided against it. Now, with post #2 on the subject, I’ve decided to include a link. Check it out if you’re interested. Anyway, I guess what I’m saying is that sometimes acknowledging, embracing and surrounding yourself with femininity isn’t a waste of time. You may have enough of that on a daily basis to get your dose, or you may prefer to avoid that particular brand of medicine altogether, but I am certain there are some who feel their feminine souls threatened by a masculine pressure to be tough (don’t cry, don’t let that lip quiver), by exclusionary male traditions (my sales team – all 13 are men – enjoy an annual “He-man woman-haters” weekend of horseshoes) and other stupid stuff daily. It can be sooo nice to discuss business with women for a change…hard to quantify, but real.
    As for your award? It is what it is. Your attitude (“I’m going to continue to thank those that choose recognize me as a shining example of my gender”) is graceful…stick with it. The fact that you don’t feel the need to be plugged in on a gender-specific level is not naive – it is fortunate.

    http://potluckmama.com/2010/02/02/netweaving-why-i-dont-mind-attending-events/

  • Anita Weissman

    After all the women’s movement has done, good and bad, we still get 79 cents on the dollar. Anyone who thinks she has achieved equality by thinking of her self as a person not a woman or by not joining women’s groups is fooling herself. The indelible mark you leave may not care you were a chick but it will differ because you were.

  • Amber

    Anita – You’re totally entitled to live your life the way you want. I was very clear that I recognize that bias and inequalities exist, and never claimed to have “achieved” anything. But I’m fighting my fight a different way. You do what works for you. I’ll do mine, but I’d be careful about calling people foolish because they don’t see the world through your lenses.

  • http://12commanonymous.typepad.com/ Lauren Vargas

    Rock on! Being recognized as a person first is something I am teaching both of my girls. I have never identified with other females and have found their groups to be just as discriminatory as those they gripe about…

  • Anita Weissman

    Didn’t say you were foolish, said you were fooling your self. Big difference.

  • http://www.potluckmama.wordpress.com Beth Coetzee (Pot Luck Mama)

    Lauren,
    I think it’s great you’re teaching your girls to think of themselves as people before women but let’s be careful with that broad brushstroke. There are several men from my women’s group’s overarching trade organization who attend our meetings regularly – not because their attendance is mandatory but because they find value in our group and are welcome to participate with us. It doesn’t sound like you’ve been personally exposed to it but not all women’s groups are discriminatory.

  • http://www.linkedin.com/in/barbaranelles Barbara Nelles

    Hi, Amber — The fact you felt the need to write this post made me both happy and sad. Having just read a silly wire store on how to be the new “manly man” or “retrosexual”– all I could think was just be a person, you fools!

    Women advocacy groups no longer pull me in either. But I’m glad they exist. Maybe it’s a generational thing–I well remember a short time ago when most women had no options but childbearing and housewifery–and depression.

    Sooo, I’m happy many women feel empowered, that to many we are in a post-feminist. Yet I do believe we must continue to be vigilant, especially as I look around at our society [and of course the world] and see so much inequality between men and women and disturbing retrograde trends–in much of it women are willing participants or perpetrators due to their mindsets. So I say right on to women that feel the urge and the need to continue to organize and encourage other women to be all they can be. We need that.

    When women occupy half the seats of congress and half the C-suites etc, I’ll rest a little easier for my granddaughters.

    Congratulation on all your accomplishments as a person! –barbara